Friday, May 22, 2009

TARP = CRAP = A HUGE DISCONNECT BETWEEN OUR GOVERNMENT + THE TRUTH...


http://web.mac.com/videopalitalia/iWeb/Site/Photos.html

NOW IS THE TIME FOR ALL GOOD PEOPLE TO COLME TO THE AID OF THEIR COUNTRY!




 Thursday, May 21, 2009

TARP = CRAP = A HUGE DISCONNECT BETWEEN OUR GOVERNMENT + THE TRUTH... TERMINATE THE TERMINATOR'S TERM.


http://web.mac.com/videopalitalia/iWeb/Site/Photos.html

NOW IS THE TIME FOR ALL GOOD PEOPLE TO COME TO THE AID OF THEIR COUNTRY!

THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE OR "TRANSPARENCY" BETWEEN GOVERNMENT (K STREET) AND CORPORATE AMERICA (MAIN STREET) AND BUSINESS (WALL STREET) AS WE ARE LIVING LIKE AMERICA'S "ROARING 20 s" with the robber barons and outright crooks, ruining our lives by taking away our pensions, terminating our jobs, privtizing all aspects of social services, and absolutely destroying public school education.

WE NEED TO TAKE BACK OUR NATION, TODAY!

RECALL AND IMPEACH THE GRUBENATOR, TODAY!
Wayne Dennis Kurtz.

MOORE'S LAW...

http://web.mac.com/videopalitalia/iWeb/Site/Photos.html

NOW IS THE TIME FOR ALL GOOD PEOPLE TO COME TO THE AID OF THEIR COUNTRY!

Plot of transistor counts against dates of introduction. The curve shows counts doubling every two years.

Moore's law describes a long-term trend in the history of computing hardware. Since the invention of the integrated circuit in 1958, the number of transistors that can be placed inexpensively on an integrated circuit has increasedexponentially, doubling approximately every two years.[1] The trend was first observed by Intel co-founder Gordon E. Moore in a 1965 paper.[2][3][4] It has continued for almost half a century and in 2005 was not expected to stop for another decade at least.[5]

Almost every measure of the capabilities of digital electronic devices is strongly linked to Moore's law: processing speedmemory capacity, sensors and even the number and size of pixels in digital cameras.[6] All of these are improving at (roughly) exponential rates as well.[7] This has dramatically increased the usefulness of digital electronics in nearly every segment of the world economy.[8] Moore's law describes this driving force of technological and social change in the late 20th and early 21st centuries.

MAY 22, 2009, 8:01 AM

Counting Down to the End of Moore’s Law

“We’re looking at a brick wall five years down the road,” Eli Harari, the chief executive of SanDisk, said to me earlier this week.

In 1990, when SanDisk, which he founded, shipped its first generation of flash memory — the sort that can remember information even after you turn off the power — each chip stored four million bits of information. Today, the biggest chip SanDisk makes holds 64 billion bits.

In other words, the capacity of flash chips has doubled 14 times in 19 years. That’s faster, Mr. Harari boasted, than Moore’s Law — the observation by Gordon Moore, the co-founder of Intel, that the capacity of semiconductors doubles roughly every two years.

Normally, when I’ve talked to chip executives about the limits of Moore’s Law, they are confident, in a vague sort of way, that they will be able to continue to increase the capacity of their chips one way or another.

Mr. Harari was a great deal more precise about the brick wall his company is heading toward: “We are running out of electrons.”

“When we started out we had about one million electrons per cell,” or locations where information is stored on a chip, he said. “We are now down to a few hundred.” This simply can’t go on forever, he noted: “We can’t get below one.”

SanDisk and other flash memory makers have figured out how to cram even more information into that tiny cell. Until a few years ago, each of those cells worked the way most computer memory does — it represented either a zero or a one. Now the chip can actually count how many electrons are in a cell, and depending on the number it can write and read up to 16 states (recording a number between zero and 15, or four bits to a computer).

Let’s stop for a second to take stock of the wonder of all this. The last flash memory card I bought for my camera held two gigabytes (16 billion bits). It cost me $6. And somewhere inside it is something that is counting electrons 40 at a time. An electron, in case you forgot your high-school physics, has a radius of 2.8179 × 10−15 meters. In layman’s terms it is pretty much the smallest thing you could ever count.

The problem here is that the way current flash technology stores those electrons, they don’t always follow instructions, especially as the memory card gets older.

“When you have a billion cells, you cannot uniformly control them to one electron,” Mr. Harari said. “If I want 40 electrons, plus or minus two electrons, I can do that when the device is new. But seven years out, it will start to smear.” In other words, the electron count will start to vary from one cell to the next.

SanDisk, to steal a line from a bigger Silicon Valley company, has an app for that. The controllers on each of its chips keep track of these errors and compensate for them.

There is still some more engineering to do. The company can try to make cells smaller, get more bits per cell and improve the controllers.

But at the end of the day, Mr. Harari said, it probably can double the capacity of its chips only two more times. Once the industry goes from its current 64-billion-bit chip to a 256-billion-bit chip (that’s 32 gigabytes), it will hit that brick wall.

Then what?

Your camera and music player will certainly be able to store a lot of files. But you won’t be able to count on next year’s iPhone having double the capacity at the same price.

He may be heading for a brick wall, but Mr. Harari has a plan: Head up.

“When Manhattan ran out of space, they built skyscrapers,” Mr. Harari said. “It’s the same for us.”

Right now semiconductors are all based on the particular properties of circuitry etched onto a flat piece of silicon. Four years ago, SanDisk bought Matrix Semiconductor, a company that was trying to develop a way to stack multiple layers of very tiny memory cells on top of one another.

(SanDisk is far from the only company trying to explore the third dimension in flash memory. Bill Watkins, the former chief executive of Seagate, recently joined the board of a company, Vertical Circuits, that uses a silver ooze to stack memory chips.)

So far, Mr. Harari said, the company has been able to build chips with four or eight layers. That’s the good news. The bad news is that they can write information to those chips only one time. That might be all right for distributing software or video games, but most flash memory is sold for use in devices like cameras, which need memory that can be erased and rewritten.

Mr. Harari said the company’s engineers were making good progress. But he didn’t have the Pollyanna view of some chip executives that Moore’s Law will apply forever.

“When you have a new material, all bets are off,” he said. “Until you have it, you don’t have anything.”



Wednesday, May 20, 2009

RECALL ARNOLD THE PERPETRATOR AND THE TRAITOR.


http://web.mac.com/videopalitalia/iWeb/Site/Photos.html

NOW IS THE TIME FOR ALL GOOD PEOPLE TO COME TO THE AID OF THEIR COUNTRY!



THE CRUBENATOR DESIRES TO BALANCE CALIFORNIA'S BUDGET BY CUTTING SCHOOL LUNCHES FOR POOR CHILDREN, RELEASING STATE PRISONERS, AND HARSHLY CUTTING BACK HUMANITARIAN PROGRAMS FOR THE ELDERLY (I ANSIANI), THE DISABLED AND MENTALLY ILL PEOPLES, ALL-THE-WHILE THIS JERK FLIES BACK AND FORTH TO WASHINGTON, D.C. IN ORDER TO BROKER MORE BACKROOM "DEALS" WITH HIS EASTCOAST BANKER BUDDIES TO FURTHER OPPRESS THE COMPROMISED. Wayne Dennis Kurtz.

FULL AND SUDDEN IMPACT:CALIFORNIA IS BANKRUPT...


http://web.mac.com/videopalitalia/iWeb/Site/Photos.html

NOW IS THE TIME FOR ALL GOOD PEOPLE TO COME TO THE AID OF THEIR COUNTRY!




WHERE HAS ALL THE MONEY GONE? AS THE GRUBENATOR FLIES TO WASHINGTON, D.C., TO "CURRY FAVOUR" WITH THE BELTWAY POLITICIANS...Wayne Dennis Kurtz.


California voters exercise their power -- and that's the problem

Residents relish their role in the lawmaking process, but they share the blame for the state's severe dysfunction.
By Michael Finnegan 
May 20, 2009
Californians are well known for periodic voter revolts, but on Tuesday they did more than just lash out at Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and the Legislature over the state's fiscal debacle.

By rejecting five budget measures, Californians also brought into stark relief the fact that they, too, share blame for the political dysfunction that has brought California to the brink of insolvency.

 
Rightly or wrongly, voters in the special election refused either to extend new tax hikes or to cap state spending. They also declined to unlock funds that they had voted in better financial times to set aside for special purposes.

Nearly a century after the Progressive-era birth of the state's ballot-measure system, it is clear that voters' fickle commands, one proposition at a time, are a top contributor to paralysis in Sacramento. And that, in turn, has helped cripple the capacity of the governor and Legislature to provide effective leadership to a state of more than 38 million people.

Clogged freeways, the decline of public schools, an outdated water system and a battered economy are just a few of the challenges demanding action by state leaders. Instead, they are consumed by yet another budget crisis, one that voters worsened Tuesday.

California election results
Voters are to decide on five propositions aimed at shoring up California's finances and another that would freeze state salaries.
Other contests include a runoff for L.A. city attorney and races for L.A. City Council, state Senate and U.S. House seats.
What would the props do?
"No one's really stepping back and confronting the harsh realities that face our state in a critical sense, because of constraints put on our elected leaders," said Mark Baldassare, president of the Public Policy Institute of California. "We're unable to focus on the long term and the big picture at a time when we desperately need to do so."

The results Tuesday fit Californians' long-standing pattern of demanding what is ultimately irreconcilable, all the more so in an economic downturn: lower taxes and higher spending.

"We all want a free lunch, but unfortunately that doesn't exist," said former Gov. Gray Davis, whose 2003 recall stemmed largely from a budget crisis brought on by the dot-com bust. For decades, Davis said, Californians have been "papering over this fundamental reality that the state has been living beyond its means."

Davis and many other elected officials bear some responsibility for that. But so do voters.

In the Proposition 13 tax rebellion of 1978, Californians voted to require a two-thirds approval by the Legislature to raise taxes, a major obstacle to budget agreements. Over the last couple of decades, voters have also passed a patchwork of ballot measures directing billions of dollars to favorite causes, among them public schools and transportation projects.

On Tuesday, Californians showed they were unwilling to scale back their demands in tight times: Voters turned down propositions that would have freed up money that they set aside years ago for mental-health and children's programs.

"The irony is that the more the hands of the Legislature and governor are tied up, the more frustrated people are," said Tim Hodson, director of the Center for California Studies at Cal State Sacramento.

Together, voters' piecemeal decisions since the 1970s have effectively "emasculated the Legislature," said John Allswang, a retired Cal State L.A. history professor.

"They're looking for cheap answers -- throw the guys out of power and put somebody else in, or just blame the politicians and pretend you don't have to raise taxes when you need money," he said.

"This is what the public wants, and they deceive themselves constantly. They're not realistic."

The public's contradictory impulses were laid bare by a recent Field Poll. It found that voters oppose cutbacks in 10 of 12 major categories of state spending, including the biggest, education and healthcare. Yet most voters were unwilling to have their own taxes increased, and they overwhelmingly favored keeping the two-thirds requirement for tax hikes.

"They clearly want more in services than they're willing to pay for in taxes," said Ethan Rarick, director of the Robert T. Matsui Center for Politics and Public Service at UC Berkeley.

Also intensifying California's troubles is a surge in debt, often with voter consent at the ballot box, which makes future budgets harder and harder to balance. Under Davis, outstanding general-obligation debt jumped from $26 billion to $37 billion; it has soared to more than $70 billion under Schwarzenegger, according to the state treasurer's office.

Adding to the state's difficulties is the complexity of many ballot measures, no doubt a factor in the defeat of the main budget measures that lawmakers put before voters Tuesday.

"We pay the legislators to go to Sacramento and figure these things out," said Denise Spooner, a lecturer on California history at Cal State Fullerton. 

As for the cumulative problems created by the last few decades of ballot-measure voting, she said, "I certainly don't think this is what the Progressives had in mind."

To John Hein, a veteran Sacramento campaign consultant, the absence of any master vision by voters appears to be a key flaw in the state's recent history with ballot measures.

"They kind of take each issue in a microcosm, rather than relate the decision to prior decisions, or future decisions that they might make," he said. "Voters don't think about the consequences of how one thing fits with another."

Others point to the term limits that voters imposed on state officials in 1990 as an enduring problem. Lawmakers who focus on quick career advancement tend to neglect California's long-term problems, they say.

Whatever the ups and downs of the proposition system, California's voters have seen themselves for a full century as "the arbiters of the future of the state," said social historian D.J. Waldie. To Waldie, the grim circumstances of Tuesday's election suggest that they are losing faith in any grand ambitions for public investment in California's future.

"I'm rather pessimistic at this point," he said. "We're reaching the point where Californians are throwing in the towel."

michael.finnegan@latimes.com

 

Monday, May 18, 2009

NO BLOOD FOR OIL...


http://web.mac.com/videopalitalia/iWeb/Site/Photos.html

NOW IS THE TIME FOR ALL GOOD PEOPLE TO COME TO THE AID OF THEIR COUNTRY!

LET ME SEE IF I UNDERSTAND THIS CORRECTLY? #1 THE GOOD OL' USA GOVERNMENT POSSESSES ABSOLUTELY NO CONTROL OVER THE PRICE OF ENERGY, ESPECIALLY BENZINA; #2 WE CONTINUE TO SAY "HOW HIGH" WHEN ISRAEL ORDERS UNCLE SAM "TO JUMP"; #3 WE AS A NATION CONTINUE TO SACRIFICE THE LIVES AND SOULS OF YOUNG AMERICAN MEN AND WOMEN TO KILL AND BE KILLED IN THE MIDDLE EAST SO THAT WE CAN CHOKE ON OUR OWN AUTOMOBILE FUMES, DIE OF ASTHMA AND CANCER, AND TURN OUR COLLECTIVE HEADS AWAY FROM AFGHANISTAN'S AND MEXICO'S HEROIN DRUG TRADING IN OUR COMMUNITIES?

DOES ANYONE ELSE SEE THE DANGEROUS GAME THAT WE ARE PLAYING, ON OURSELVES?

Wayne Dennis Kurtz.

Friday, May 15, 2009

PLEASE SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL BOOK STORES...Oh, give me a home where the buffalo roam and you can sip lattes and read good books, all the day long...

PLEASE SUPPORT AND ATTEND THE LOS ANGELES TIMES UCLA SPRING FESTIVAL OF BOOKS. IT IS A FAMILY TREASURE.
http://web.mac.com/videopalitalia/iWeb/Site/Photos.html

NOW IS THE TIME FOR ALL GOOD PEOPLE TO COME TO THE AID OF THEIR COUNTRY
!



PLEASE SUPPORT DUCKS SOUP IN THEIR NEW VAN NUYS STORE AND CITY LIGHTS IN SAN FRANCISCO.PLEASE SUPPORT YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD BOOKSTORES AND LOCAL PUBLIC LIBRARIES.

Wayne Dennis Kurtz.

Thursday, May 14, 2009

SUDDEN LESBIAN SYNDROME, COMING SOON TO A THEATRE NEAR YOU...this means you!


http://web.mac.com/videopalitalia/iWeb/Site/Photos.html

NOW IS THE TIME FOR ALL GOOD PEOPLE TO COME TO THE AID OF THEIR COUNTRY
!

Men,

  If your wife or girlfriend asks to tune up your Chevy truck, then she needs help...:)

Wayne Dennis Kurtz.

CNN/Oprah.com: Calls Sudden Lesbian Syndrome a 'New' Trend Without Any Proof


Oprah.com and CNN have decided that there is a growing "new" trend in American sexual relations. The two Internet giants have teamed up and have decided that increasingly "women are leaving men for other women." Shocking news, I know. Only one little problem. Oprah.com has no proof for any such proclamation.

After the shocking headline and the first three paragraphs proclaiming a new lesbian revolution in America today, though, the piece admits that there are no real statistics to prove the thesis. The whole claim is merely based on the anecdotal stories of the "experts" that Oprah.com dug up to substantiate the tale.





aALLWEARESAYINGISGIVEPEACEACHANCE...


http://web.mac.com/videopalitalia/iWeb/Site/Photos.html

NOW IS THE TIME FOR ALL GOOD PEOPLE TO COME TO THE AID OF THEIR COUNTRY
!




John Lennon and Yoko Ono sing "ALLWESAYINGISGIVEPEACEACHANCE"...


On You Tube...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDFFh8ZSqV0

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

IL GIRO D'ITALIA - THE TOUR OF ITALY.

LANCE ARMSTRONG, AT 37 YEARS OLD, COMPETES WITH INTEGRITY IN THE 2009 GIRO D' ITALIA,,,
http://web.mac.com/videopalitalia/iWeb/Site/Photos.html

NOW IS THE TIME FOR ALL GOOD PEOPLE TO COME TO THE AID OF THEIR COUNTRY!

With his eyes chiseled deep into his head, Lance Armstrong looked on. Up ahead, top riders like Ivan Basso, Danilo DiLuca, Levi Leipheimer, Denis Menchov and Carlos Sastre rode away on the stage five climb to Alpe di Siusi at the 2009 Giro d’Italia.

In his prime, Armstrong could have dropped any of these riders with just one leg. But that was when he was in his prime. On Wednesday, the 37-year-old American found himself in the middle of his biggest test since announcing his comeback: a 125-kilometer mountain stage in the Tour of Italy.

With his back hunched, Armstrong’s eyes appeared to be searching. Perhaps he wondered, at least briefly, just why he returned to competitive racing after retiring three years absence. Just seven kilometers from the finish on Alpe de Siusi, Armstrong was all alone except for a handful of Astana teammates helping him limit his time losses on the day.

“I hoped to lose two minutes,” Armstrong said afterwards. Instead he lost three on what could at best be described as a valiant effort and an example of the seven-time Tour de France winner’s legendary concentration.

But Armstrong is a master of peaking. He knew coming into this race that he was in no condition to contend for overall victory. “No I don’t think that is possible. I don’t think it’s possible to win the Giro,” he said before the start of the race. “We’re just not there yet.”

The Giro d’Italia is the first major test of his comeback. After breaking his collar bone in March, the Giro-like the Tour de France a three-week race-became a “Must.”

Currently, after the first five stages, Armstrong has proven to be a solid “B” student-not bad for a rider that has not raced in Europe for over three years.

“Like I said in the beginning, the first half is not going to be my half. I have to ride into the race and get my condition back after the accident,” Armstrong said after finishing 2 minutes 59 seconds behind Denis Menchov, the winner of stage five. “I didn’t come in with any big illusions. I knew I’d be minutes behind the best guys.”

Although Menchov did not see Armstrong for much of the final climb, he seemed confident that Armstrong is on track for the Tour de France. “Lance Armstrong isn’t here to fight for overall. But he’s good - he’ll be good at the Tour.”

After hitting the Alps early in this year’s race, the riders now have a significant break before any serious climbing returns. That’s good news for Armstrong, as it gives him ample opportunity to improve his condition and recover before the next major test.

“I’m definitely a little tired, it’s a hard climb and we knew that we’d be behind,” he told Rai TV. “We just said ride tempo and try to limit the losses. I’ve always said the first half is not going to be mine, I’ve still not got my condition back after my accident and I can’t expect to be at the front.”